[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:04:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:16:45PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Felix Zielcke:
> >
> > Thanks to the hint from rubisher I looked now at Linux Makefiles.
> > They use this:
> >
> > NOSTDINC_FLAGS += -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC) -print-file-name=include)
> >
> > # ls $(gcc-4.4 -print-file-name=include)/stdarg.h
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.2/include/stdarg.h
> >
>
> Robert?
> IMO this makes at least more sense then what we have now
> and I just tested this now with and without a seperate build directory
> with experimental branch and it works
> TARGET_CPPFLAGS = @TARGET_CPPFLAGS@ -nostdinc -isystem $(shell $(CC)
> -print-file-name=include) -I$(srcdir)/include -I$(builddir)
> -I$(builddir)/include -Wall -W
What's the advantage?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Felix Zielcke, 2009/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Felix Zielcke, 2009/11/14
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Felix Zielcke, 2009/11/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Robert Millan, 2009/11/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Felix Zielcke, 2009/11/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Robert Millan, 2009/11/15
- Re: [PATCH] Add -nostdinc to TARGET_CFLAGS, Felix Zielcke, 2009/11/15