grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Let user specify OpenBSD root device.


From: Robert Millan
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let user specify OpenBSD root device.
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:31:31 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:00:31PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Millan<address@hidden> wrote:
> >   
> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:37:33PM +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko 
> >> wrote:
> >>     
> >>> +  if (cmd->state[OPENBSD_ROOT_ARG].set)
> >>> +    {
> >>> +      const char *arg = cmd->state[OPENBSD_ROOT_ARG].arg;
> >>> +      int unit, part;
> >>> +      if (*(arg++) != 'w' || *(arg++) != 'd')
> >>> +     return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_BAD_ARGUMENT,
> >>> +                        "Only device specifications of form "
> >>> +                        "wd<number><lowercase letter> are supported.");
> >>> +
> >>> +      unit = grub_strtoul (arg, (char **) &arg, 10);
> >>> +      if (! (arg && *arg >= 'a' && *arg <= 'z'))
> >>> +     return grub_error (GRUB_ERR_BAD_ARGUMENT,
> >>> +                        "Only device specifications of form "
> >>> +                        "wd<number><letter> are supported.");
> >>>       
> >> Looks like the first error string could be used for both cases, saving
> >> a few bytes.
> >>
> >>     
> This was fixed. Can this patch be comitted before release to avoid
> changing command syntax after release?

Ok.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]