[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Require at least gcc 4.2
|
From: |
Robert Millan |
|
Subject: |
Re: Require at least gcc 4.2 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:05:06 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 03:12:14PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Robert Millan <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 23:26:11 +0200
>
> > David et al, can we agree on a minimal version of GCC that we should
> > recommend?
> >
> > For mentioning in the INSTALL file only. I assume nobody's interested in
> > gcc 2.95.
>
> I think gcc-4.1.x, maybe specifically gcc-4.1.3 is a reasonable
> base point.
Ok. For the time being it'll list GCC 4.1.3.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, (continued)
- Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, David Miller, 2009/09/01
- Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, David Miller, 2009/09/01
- Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, Robert Millan, 2009/09/03
- Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, Neil Cafferkey, 2009/09/06
- Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, Robert Millan, 2009/09/06
Re: Require at least gcc 4.2, Robert Millan, 2009/09/01