Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC

[Felix Zielcke]

Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2009, 17:36 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:20:19PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Oh, I was wrong previously, gcc does respect __attribute__
> > ((__regparm__ (3))) flag (I forget to add -Os so it still uses stack
> > to store value). And the bug is still there ! Try this test program:
> 
> Thanks Bean.  I have opened an entry in GCC bugzilla, and submitted your
> test program in it:
> 
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41246
> 
> Hopefully they'll fix it in later versions, and hopefully people will
> upgrade soon.  In the meantime, we're stuck with it.
> 

Is there any reason why we fallback to regparm 1 and not to regparm 2?
According to the output of the testcase in the above bug report 2 seems
to work too?

-- 
Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer