Re: Require at least gcc 4.2

[David Miller]

From: "Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko" <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:12:20 +0200

> Even if gcc<4.2 seem to work ok I think we shouldn't waste resources
> on it and officially declare a minimal requirement ("you're free to go
> under requirement but don't post bugreports if you do")

You're making it such that I won't be able to do development on my
main sparc development machine, which is using gcc-4.1.3

In my view, this is going a bit overboard as a method to address this
problem.