[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TPM support status ?
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: TPM support status ? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:48:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:41:54AM +0200, Michael Gorven wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 August 2009 21:21:28 Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Tell me one technical benefit of TPM over coreboot.
>
> Coreboot doesn't provide protected storage of secrets (e.g. harddrive
> decryption keys).
Note that coreboot itself is not a complete firmware, it's a framework
that can be combined with other components, like GRUB, to produce a
bootloader-class firmware.
With your help, coreboot+GRUB may well support encrypted hard drives.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), (continued)
- about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), Robert Millan, 2009/08/20
- Re: about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), decoder, 2009/08/20
- Re: about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/20
- Re: about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), Robert Millan, 2009/08/20
- Re: about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), decoder, 2009/08/20
- Re: about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/20
- Re: about smartcards (Re: TPM support status ?), Robert Millan, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Duboucher Thomas, 2009/08/20
- Re: TPM support status ?, Michal Suchanek, 2009/08/21
- Re: TPM support status ?,
Robert Millan <=
Re: TPM support status ?, Robert Millan, 2009/08/20