Re: [PATCH] Improve handling of "keep" in gfxpayload

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

> I think I'll remove GRUB_ASSUME_LINUX_HAS_FB_SUPPORT.  It seems that nobody
> is going to use it, so all it does is add complexity.  This will also make
> your patch simpler.
>
> Is there any objection to that?
I'm ok with that. Generally I think that whenever we have the same
configuration available at build and config time we should remove
build time as it adds complexity for nothing. The only exception I
could think of is disabling some features to make code smaller.
However I hope we won't have to introduce cherrypicking compiling when
user is required to choose core features - it's simply too easy to get
wrong and hard to debug
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
>  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
>  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
>  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git