|
From: | Christian Franke |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] ntldr support |
Date: | Sat, 08 Aug 2009 23:57:48 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 |
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
About the command, i think that it will be simpler for the user if we have only one command: chainloader (like in grub4dos) that will try to detect the type of the bootloader. This is only my personal opinion.I don't agree with this. chainloader and ntldr don't share the same syntax: chainloader expects a bootsector whereas ntldr expects an ntldr ot bootmgr file. GRUB2 is done to break with bad design decisions of GRUB1 one of them being "kernel" command. GRUB4DOS follows GRUB1 on this subject.
I agree.It probably would make sense that the 'ntldr' command does simple signature checks and fail on unknown files unless '--force' is specified.
-- Regards, Christian Franke
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |