[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: grub-pe2elf
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: grub-pe2elf |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:29:18 -0400 |
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 11:53 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I personally think this is a hassle for nothing: we already have a
> working cygwin toolchain. While I acknowledge it's not perfect it
> works. And I propose not to touch it until it gives any maintainance
> or technical problem. When it does then we may consider dropping or
> limiting cygwin support. Until then this discussion is a waste of time
> (IMO)
I agree that there is no urgent need to remove grub-pe2elf (although the
issue might come up essentially). However, it's not so much a technical
problem as an issue of trust.
Committing code against the wish of maintainers should not be permitted.
Those who do it should lose commit access. They are welcome to
contribute, but their patches will need to be committed by others.
I haven't seen any apology or explanation in this thread.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Robert Millan, 2009/08/01
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Christian Franke, 2009/08/01
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Robert Millan, 2009/08/02
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Christian Franke, 2009/08/03
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/08/03
- Re: grub-pe2elf,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Robert Millan, 2009/08/04
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Christian Franke, 2009/08/04
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Robert Millan, 2009/08/04
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Robert Millan, 2009/08/04
- Re: grub-pe2elf, Christian Franke, 2009/08/04