Re: [PATCH] UUID support for UFS

[Pavel Roskin]

On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 20:46 +0200, Javier Martín wrote:
> Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko escribió:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Pavel Roskin<address@hidden> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 15:03 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> >>> +      grub_sprintf (*uuid, "%08lx%08lx",
> >>> +                   (unsigned long) grub_le_to_cpu32 
> >>> (data->sblock.uuidhi),
> >>> +                   (unsigned long) grub_le_to_cpu32 
> >>> (data->sblock.uuidlow));
> >> unsigned long is 64-bit on x86_64.  unsigned int would do just fine
> >> here.
> > Ok
> We could use the <inttypes.h> macros for [u]intN_t types:
>        grub_sprintf (*uuid, PRIx32 "-" PRIx32,
>                         grub_le_to_cpu32 (data->sblock.uuidhi),
>                         grub_le_to_cpu32 (data->sblock.uuidlow));
> Of course, our *printf functions would have to recognize them, and we'd 
> have to provide a suitable default for the header if the system compiler 
> is not C99 compliant, but I think it's a good step forwards.
> 
> I would be willing to implement such a header/change to the *printf 
> functions if there's any interest in them.

I think we shouldn't overengineer this.  We don't support platforms
where int is not 32-bit.  If we add support for such platform, we'll
have more issues than just printf.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin