[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 3/7] Eliminate kernel_segment
|
From: |
Robert Millan |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 3/7] Eliminate kernel_segment |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:45:07 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:00:30PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> ChangeLog:
>
> * boot/i386/pc/boot.S (kernel_segment): Remove.
> (copy_buffer): Copy to 0x0000:0x8000, not to 0x0800:0x0000.
This looks like it would set an higher limit to the kernel link address. Are
we certain we want this?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- [PATCH 1/7] Make boot/i386/pc/boot.S safer to modify, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- [PATCH 2/7] Remove unused version information from boot/i386/pc/boot.S, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- [PATCH 3/7] Eliminate kernel_segment, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- Re: [PATCH 3/7] Eliminate kernel_segment,
Robert Millan <=
- [PATCH 4/7] Eliminate kernel_address, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- [PATCH 5/7] Add newline after "Error" in bootsector, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- [PATCH 6/7] Increase BPB size to accommodate FAT32., Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- [PATCH 7/7] RFC: Use correct addresses, eliminate manual relocations, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/14
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] RFC: Use correct addresses, eliminate manual relocations, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/15
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] RFC: Use correct addresses, eliminate manual relocations, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/07/15
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] RFC: Use correct addresses, eliminate manual relocations, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/15
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] RFC: Use correct addresses, eliminate manual relocations, Pavel Roskin, 2009/07/15
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] RFC: Use correct addresses, eliminate manual relocations, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/07/16