Re: support for crashkernel= in 10_linux.in

[Robert Millan]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:18:08PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 15:11 +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
> 
> > Maybe - my rational was to keep recovery mode as simple as
> > possible. And also in case there is a issue with the crashkernel=
> > commandlinethe user is still able to use recovery mode (its pretty
> > unlikely that there are problems though).
> 
> I think it a patch that could stay in the Ubuntu package for the time
> being.  It makes assumptions about the kernel that are not correct in
> the general case.

Uhm what does "384M-2G:64M,2G-:128M" mean?  It looks like some sort of
address or memory range.  Perhaps there's some portable way to obtain this
information from the system?

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."