[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 uncond
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:10:52 -0400 |
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 12:26 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:22:41PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >
> > Then I guess the Apple compiler won't accepted %ds: either, so if we
> > want to use %ds, we should omit it.
>
> Btw, it's Apple assembler that matters here. AFAIK their compiler is GCC.
>
> I think those checks would need some adjustment, or it'll be a mess when
> we want to support GNU binutils on MacOS.
In most cases, we just want to leave the APPLE_CC version, as it's more
portable. But we should verify that the same bytecode is generated,
just to be safe.
In many cases, I'd like to see if there is a simpler workaround.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to the Apple compiler.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: about Apple compiler (Re: [PATCH] access gdtdesc on segment 0 unconditionally (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)),
Pavel Roskin <=
[PATCH] s/GRUB_MEMORY_MACHINE_LINK_ADDR/GRUB_KERNEL_MACHINE_LINK_ADDR/g (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/23
- [PATCH] fix for loading modules from read-only memory area (Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] fix for loading modules from read-only memory area (Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/25
- Re: [PATCH] fix for loading modules from read-only memory area (Re: clean patch for i386-qemu port (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/25