[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org
From: |
Michael Gorven |
Subject: |
Re: Data loss at savannah.gnu.org |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:50:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Monday 01 June 2009 16:22:12 Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> I say we should go for git. It would safeguard us from possible future
> problems with savannah as we can easily switch between different git
> mirrors. Additionally the main argument not to switch to git was that
> it doesn't give much benefit considering the effort. Now when it's
> more effort to have a complete svn rather than git I think git is
> better solution
I've found Bazaar the nicest to work with out of the major DVCSs. I also think
that it has the lowest learning curve from Subversion (e.g. bound branches
basically behave like SVN checkouts).
Michael
--
http://michael.gorven.za.net
PGP Key ID 6612FE85
S/MIME Key ID AAF09E0E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.