[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gptsync
From: |
Isaac Dupree |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gptsync |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:49:48 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.4 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.1.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Peter Cros wrote:
> I don't think it is compatible with current MBR/GPT hybrid ?partitioning on
> intel macs for grub-pc booting.
well, it doesn't necessarily order the partitions in the same way as e.g.
rEFIt gptsync does, but that's because this GRUB implementation gives you more
control! You can even pick different MBR-partition-configurations, before
booting different OSes.
Vladimir Serbinenko wrote:
> Here there are 2 differences. First partition type for hfs+ isn't
> autodetected, I will fix this, just I thought it ws unnecessary AFAIK every
> OS which understands HFS+ understands GPT.
At least Mac OS X 10.3 and earlier don't understand GPT, and it actually makes
a difference with Apple's "target disk mode"! And there may be a few other
combinations.
-Isaac
- [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/19
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/20
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/20
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/21
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/21
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/21
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync,
Isaac Dupree <=
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/21
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2009/04/21
- Re: [PATCH] gptsync, Peter Cros, 2009/04/21