[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no commit allowed under discussion
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: no commit allowed under discussion |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:37:47 +0900 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:43:17 Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bean <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <address@hidden>
wrote:
> >> I've undone r2063, since we're still discussing how to / not to split
> >> modules. Bean, you must respect teamwork. If you are unable to follow
> >> such a fundamental rule, I will have to disable your permission.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thought the previous mail is about replacing grub_printf with
> > grub_dprint, I'm ok with that. This patch has been in mail list for
> > sometime, it is essential to get a working display in intel macs.
>
> Hi,
>
> How about this patch ? The split is necessary as it introduces new
> command loadbios and fakebios that uses the fake_bios_data function,
> and it would be ugly to put them all inside linux.c.
Do you have any strong reason to make loadbios and fakebios separate? I think
the overhead is negligible.
Regards,
Okuji
- no commit allowed under discussion, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2009/04/04
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Bean, 2009/04/04
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Bean, 2009/04/06
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, phcoder, 2009/04/06
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Bean, 2009/04/07
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Peter Cros, 2009/04/09
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Drew Rosen, 2009/04/14
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Peter Cros, 2009/04/14
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Peter Cros, 2009/04/14
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2009/04/09
- Re: no commit allowed under discussion, Bean, 2009/04/10