[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation.
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation. |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:39:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:34:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > I think we're already using longs this way in quite a few places. It's not
> > such a big deal IMHO.
>
> And ironically enough, using "unsigned long" would allow us to
> share this header with any future 32-bit sparc GRUB support.
Are there any GNU/Linux distributions still supporting 32-bit sparc?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., (continued)
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., David Miller, 2009/03/04
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., Isaac Dupree, 2009/03/05
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., David Miller, 2009/03/05
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., Robert Millan, 2009/03/06
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., Pavel Roskin, 2009/03/06
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., David Miller, 2009/03/06
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., Pavel Roskin, 2009/03/07
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., Robert Millan, 2009/03/07
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., David Miller, 2009/03/07
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation., David Miller, 2009/03/06
- Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation.,
Robert Millan <=