[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Menu locks / password authentication
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: Menu locks / password authentication |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:04:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 05:32:40PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > It's funny, we're all discussing about performing security measurements in
> > GRUB and nobody mentioned that our user interface lacks even the most basic
> > lock mechanism :-)
> >
> > Perhaps this would be a good time to retake the discussion on implementing
> > an equivalent to "lock" and "password" commands. I think I even sent a
> > patch
> > a while ago!
> >
> > Vesa, do you still think we should design an extensible framework for
> > authentication before we do anything else? I think it'd be interesting if
> > we could implement the lock/password paradigm, even if later it would be
> > replaced, since our users commonly need this, and it's blocking the
> > transition from GRUB Legacy.
>
> I think that most important thing at this time is to match needed
> functionality with GRUB legacy. So just make it clean and perhaps think
> a bit about how it can be easily extended :).
>
> I think there was some hash algorithms posted previously that could be
> used for this.
Hashing is nice, but basic password support can work without hash. If you
give grub.cfg the proper perms, that is.
Anyway, for those interested:
http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg05350.html
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."