[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 00:19:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:57:50PM +0100, Jan Alsenz wrote:
> >
> > You took the least relevant part of my argument, and assumed this is the
> > reason
> > I object to TPMs. Please check the rest of my previous mail.
>
> I didn't assume that. And I picked this argument because it is the only one I
> object!
> Because I think it is not an argument...
>
> > Anyway, it's obvious that I trust my CPU because I have no other choice.
> > The
> > context in which I said this, is different: there are better choices there.
>
> ... and since you seem to agree, please don't use it.
>
>
> You seem to assume, that I really like the idea of a TPM, or something like
> that.
> I can assure you, that this is not the case. My only goal is to keep the
> discussion based on facts and reason. Which way too often get lost in this
> kind
> of discussion (and I want to stress that this is not an accusation to anyone
> here).
Thanks for clarifiing, I appreciate your response.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, (continued)
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Michael Gorven, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Michael Gorven, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Isaac Dupree, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/27
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/27
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/21