[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM
|
From: |
Robert Millan |
|
Subject: |
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:22:44 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:10:22AM +0200, Alex Besogonov wrote:
> I know that TPM has been mentioned several times on this list. With
> absolutely inadequate knee-jerk reactions from GRUB developers :(
As far as I can recall, I think all my replies explaining why TPMs are a
serious threat to our freedom were polite and respectful. Please think
twice before labeling a reply you disagree with as
"inadequate knee-jerk reaction", or it will be impossible to have a
reasonable discussion over this issue.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, (continued)
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/18
- Message not available
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Colin D Bennett, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Michal Suchanek, 2009/02/19
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/19
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM,
Robert Millan <=
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/18
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/19