[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC)
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC) |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Feb 2009 14:01:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:24:57AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > So if the table is basicaly storing values that enumerate something, why are
> > we using hex to represent them? Hex gives the impression they're an opaque
> > sort of thing, like code, bitmasks or magic numbers.
>
> Your guess is as good as mine.
> [...]
>
> > We'd also need to know what are these "'casefold' and 'order' tables from
> > ARDI's code", and what exactly means this is a "composition" of them.
>
> Your guess is as good as mine.
My impression so far is that this is a confusing mess (which can probably
be fixed with a little effort), that this situation doesn't bother you at
all, and that you want to make it clear to us how all of this is irrelevant
to you.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: hfs patch (Re: State of GRUB on PowerPC), (continued)