==11709== Memcheck, a memory error detector. ==11709== Copyright (C) 2002-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==11709== Using LibVEX rev 1854, a library for dynamic binary translation. ==11709== Copyright (C) 2004-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by OpenWorks LLP. ==11709== Using valgrind-3.3.1-Debian, a dynamic binary instrumentation framework. ==11709== Copyright (C) 2000-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==11709== For more details, rerun with: -v ==11709== ==11709== My PID = 11709, parent PID = 10584. Prog and args are: ==11709== ./grub-probe ==11709== / ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x4015287: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4004EF2: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4007A48: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4002EBB: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00094B: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x401504E: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x40072CA: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4007D15: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400176A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400D205: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400166E: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4003AEF: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x4015059: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x40072CA: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4007D15: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400176A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400D205: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400166E: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4003AEF: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x4015064: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x40072CA: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4007D15: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400176A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400D205: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400166E: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4003AEF: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x40152A1: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x40072D7: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4007D15: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400176A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400D205: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400166E: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4003AEF: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x40152A1: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400A13D: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4005F57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4007DBC: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400176A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400D205: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400166E: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4003AEF: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x400A851: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400374A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00094B: ??? ==11709== ==11709== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==11709== at 0x400A85A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x400374A: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4013CC4: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4001308: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x4000A57: (within /lib/ld-2.8.so) ==11709== by 0x1: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00093E: ??? ==11709== by 0x7FF00094B: ??? ==11709== Warning: noted but unhandled ioctl 0x1261 with no size/direction hints ==11709== This could cause spurious value errors to appear. ==11709== See README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL for guidance on writing a proper wrapper. ==11709== Warning: noted but unhandled ioctl 0x1261 with no size/direction hints ==11709== This could cause spurious value errors to appear. ==11709== See README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL for guidance on writing a proper wrapper. ==11709== Warning: noted but unhandled ioctl 0x1261 with no size/direction hints ==11709== This could cause spurious value errors to appear. ==11709== See README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL for guidance on writing a proper wrapper. ==11709== ==11709== ERROR SUMMARY: 8 errors from 8 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) ==11709== malloc/free: in use at exit: 90,406 bytes in 34 blocks. ==11709== malloc/free: 279 allocs, 245 frees, 564,287 bytes allocated. ==11709== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v ==11709== searching for pointers to 34 not-freed blocks. ==11709== checked 215,536 bytes. ==11709== ==11709== ==11709== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 15 ==11709== at 0x4C20FEB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==11709== by 0x4036B9: xmalloc (misc.c:95) ==11709== by 0x4041EB: find_root_device (getroot.c:248) ==11709== by 0x40431F: grub_guess_root_device (getroot.c:379) ==11709== by 0x4016CC: probe (grub-probe.c:122) ==11709== by 0x401D67: main (grub-probe.c:372) ==11709== ==11709== ==11709== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 3 of 15 ==11709== at 0x4C20FEB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==11709== by 0x4036B9: xmalloc (misc.c:95) ==11709== by 0x403AF0: grub_malloc (misc.c:236) ==11709== by 0x41D3A3: grub_partition_parse (pc.c:47) ==11709== by 0x41D9F4: pc_partition_map_probe (pc.c:255) ==11709== by 0x4080A8: part_map_probe.2036 (partition.c:66) ==11709== by 0x407FEF: grub_partition_map_iterate (partition.c:51) ==11709== by 0x408080: grub_partition_probe (partition.c:81) ==11709== by 0x404EE7: grub_disk_open (disk.c:273) ==11709== by 0x404643: grub_device_open (device.c:50) ==11709== by 0x4017EF: probe (grub-probe.c:166) ==11709== by 0x401D67: main (grub-probe.c:372) ==11709== ==11709== ==11709== 68 (64 direct, 4 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 4 of 15 ==11709== at 0x4C20FEB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==11709== by 0x4036B9: xmalloc (misc.c:95) ==11709== by 0x403AF0: grub_malloc (misc.c:236) ==11709== by 0x404D58: grub_disk_open (disk.c:222) ==11709== by 0x4031A1: grub_util_biosdisk_get_grub_dev (biosdisk.c:860) ==11709== by 0x404555: grub_util_get_grub_dev (getroot.c:469) ==11709== by 0x40178F: probe (grub-probe.c:155) ==11709== by 0x401D67: main (grub-probe.c:372) ==11709== ==11709== ==11709== 96 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 15 ==11709== at 0x4C20FEB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==11709== by 0x4036B9: xmalloc (misc.c:95) ==11709== by 0x403AF0: grub_malloc (misc.c:236) ==11709== by 0x41D3A3: grub_partition_parse (pc.c:47) ==11709== by 0x41D9F4: pc_partition_map_probe (pc.c:255) ==11709== by 0x4080A8: part_map_probe.2036 (partition.c:66) ==11709== by 0x407FEF: grub_partition_map_iterate (partition.c:51) ==11709== by 0x408080: grub_partition_probe (partition.c:81) ==11709== by 0x404EE7: grub_disk_open (disk.c:273) ==11709== by 0x42201A: hook.2567 (raid.c:600) ==11709== by 0x4047F6: iterate_partition.2158 (device.c:129) ==11709== by 0x41D724: pc_partition_map_iterate (pc.c:155) ==11709== ==11709== ==11709== 96 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 15 ==11709== at 0x4C20FEB: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) ==11709== by 0x4036B9: xmalloc (misc.c:95) ==11709== by 0x403AF0: grub_malloc (misc.c:236) ==11709== by 0x41D3A3: grub_partition_parse (pc.c:47) ==11709== by 0x41D9F4: pc_partition_map_probe (pc.c:255) ==11709== by 0x4080A8: part_map_probe.2036 (partition.c:66) ==11709== by 0x407FEF: grub_partition_map_iterate (partition.c:51) ==11709== by 0x408080: grub_partition_probe (partition.c:81) ==11709== by 0x404EE7: grub_disk_open (disk.c:273) ==11709== by 0x4202D4: grub_lvm_scan_device (lvm.c:224) ==11709== by 0x4047F6: iterate_partition.2158 (device.c:129) ==11709== by 0x41D724: pc_partition_map_iterate (pc.c:155) ==11709== ==11709== LEAK SUMMARY: ==11709== definitely lost: 290 bytes in 11 blocks. ==11709== indirectly lost: 4 bytes in 1 blocks. ==11709== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==11709== still reachable: 90,112 bytes in 22 blocks. ==11709== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks. ==11709== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. ==11709== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes