[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GRUB integral types? Why grub_uint32_t and not uint32_t?
|
From: |
Colin D Bennett |
|
Subject: |
GRUB integral types? Why grub_uint32_t and not uint32_t? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2008 08:57:56 -0700 |
I was wondering why it is necessary to use the integral types with
the "grub_" prefix instead of the standard uint32_t, int16_t, etc.?
It makes the most simple code much more verbose when we have to write
"grub_" so many times, and this seems like a case where it is not
needed.
Colin
- GRUB integral types? Why grub_uint32_t and not uint32_t?,
Colin D Bennett <=