Re: [PATCH] Add option to grub-probe to accept system devices as arguments

[Fabian Greffrath]

Robert Millan schrieb:
> I find that too unreliable.  How do you reproduce current behaviour with
> the command "grub-probe -t fs /dev/sda1" ?

I don't see the problem. Why should this be unreliable?

If the device does not exist, grub-probe will throw a "cannot stat /dev/sda1" 
error with and without the patch. If the device does exist, grub-probe will 
throw a "cannot find device for /dev/sda1" error without the patch and will 
return "ext2" with the patch applied.

See the following examples (I have /dev/hda1, but not /dev/sda1):

        Patched grub-probe:
        # grub-probe -t fs /dev/sda1
        grub-probe: error: cannot stat /dev/sda1.
        # grub-probe -t fs /dev/hda1
        ext2
        
        Current grub-probe:
        # grub-probe -t fs /dev/sda1
        grub-probe: error: Cannot stat `/dev/sda1'
        # grub-probe -t fs /dev/hda1
        grub-probe: error: cannot find a device for /dev/hda1.

> I'd prefer exposed user options than hidden behaviour like this one.

I still don't see the problem. The program will behave absolutely predictable: 
If the argument is a block device it will print the device's file system. If the 
argument is a valid path, it will prints the corresponding device's file system. 
If the argument is none of both, it will throw an error.

Cheers,
Fabian