Re: multiboot2 vs. grub2 implementation

[Bean]

On Feb 6, 2008 8:14 PM, Robert Millan <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:23:44PM -0800, walt wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 14:23 -0600, address@hidden wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:11:23AM -0800, walt wrote:
> > > > address@hidden wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> In the course of actually trying to use the MultibootDraft, I've
> > > >> discovered
> > > >> some places where the draft and the grub2 implementation differ...
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > >
> > > > Are you using grub2/cvs with or without Bean's latest multiboot patch?
> > >
> > > I tend not to be aware of these things.  I'm using stock sources.
> > >
> > > > It still hasn't been committed, and I was about to ask about it anyway.
> > > > Without that patch, multiboot doesn't work.
> > >
> > > Hmm.
> >
> > Agreed :o)  Bean's patch had some whitespace corruption anyway, so here
> > it is again, diffed against today's latest cvs grub2:
>
> If you just fixed whitespace, it is better if we just use patch -l or Bean
> fixes it.  Otherwise it means more paperwork and legal stuff :-/
>
> Bean, where you going to commit that patch?

if the patch is ok, i can check it in.

-- 
Bean