[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] read command
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] read command |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:48:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Saturday 02 February 2008 18:05, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 01:38:28PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> > > Does it make sense to move any of these two to kernel? Or to
> > > normal.mod ? Or maybe just to un-static-ize them and leave them here?
> >
> > What would be other use cases?
>
> No idea. I suggest we just leave grub_getline here and if later we find
> it's needed we can move it to normal or kernel.
OK.
> Ok, here's a new patch, with grub_getline returning NULL and the caller
> handling "out of mem" error.
>
> Also fixed a memleak.
You don't have to set grub_errno explicitly, because grub_realloc should do
it.
And, you didn't check the return value from grub_malloc.
Okuji