[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCI support
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: PCI support |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 23:01:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:08:34PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:57:38PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >> Marco Gerards <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >> > 2009-01-28 Marco Gerards <address@hidden>
> >> >
> >> > * bus/pci.c: New file.
> >> >
> >> > * include/grub/pci.h: Likewise.
> >> >
> >> > * include/grub/i386/pc/pci.h: Likewise.
> >> >
> >> > * commands/lspci.c: Likewise.
> >> >
> >> > * conf/i386-pc.rmk (pkglib_MODULES): Add `pci.mod' and
> >> > `lspci.mod'.
> >> > (pci_mod_SOURCES): New variable.
> >> > (pci_mod_CFLAGS): Likewise.
> >> > (pci_mod_LDFLAGS): Likewise.
> >> > (lspci_mod_SOURCES): Likewise.
> >> > (lspci_mod_CFLAGS): Likewise.
> >> > (lspci_mod_LDFLAGS): Likewise.
> >>
> >> No objections? Did everyone have a (quick) look at the interfaces?
> >
> > You put grub_pci_read() in an arch-specific file; is that function really
> > arch-specific, or only its IO addresses are?
>
> IO addresses are Intel only, AFAIK. Almost all architectures have
> mmapped IO. It's really arch specific.
Are you sure that makes grub_inl / grub_outl arch-specific ? They can't be
implemented as wrappers for direct memory access?
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
- PCI support, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/28
- Re: PCI support, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/30
- Re: PCI support, Robert Millan, 2008/01/30
- Re: PCI support, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/30
- Re: PCI support,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: PCI support, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/30
- Re: PCI support, Robert Millan, 2008/01/30
- Re: PCI support, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/31
- Re: PCI support, Robert Millan, 2008/01/31
Re: PCI support, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/30