Re: IA64 port

[tgingold]

Quoting Robert Millan <address@hidden>:

> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:10:21AM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> > Quoting Robert Millan <address@hidden>:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:49:31AM +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > > > -MAINTAINER_CLEANFILES = $(srcdir)/configure $(addprefix
> > > $(srcdir)/,$(MKFILES))
> > > > +MAINTAINER_CLEANFILES = $(srcdir)/configure $(MKFILES)
> > > >
> > > >  # The default target.
> > > >  all: all-local
> > > >
> > > >  ### Include an arch-specific Makefile.
> > > > -$(addprefix $(srcdir)/,$(MKFILES)): %.mk: %.rmk genmk.rb
> > > > +$(MKFILES): %.mk: %.rmk genmk.rb
> > >
> > > Don't these two break srcdir != objdir builds?
> >
> > We wrote .mk files in srcdir, and this behaviour is kept.  Did I miss your
> point
> > ?
>
> But mkfile generation itself can also happen when srcdir != objdir, can it?

Right.  I fail to understand your point: how did the patch break srcdir !=
objdir ?  I tested it with srcdir != objdir.