Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms

[Robert Millan]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:32:36AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:38:31AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >> Robert Millan <address@hidden> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:44:51AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >> >> > What do you suggest?
> >> >> 
> >> >> I would prefer to have GRUB_MOD_GAP is all headers.  Once it's not
> >> >> needed, it could be removed across the board.
> >> >
> >> > Ok, does this seem fine?
> >> 
> >> Am I missing something, or didn't you explain what GRUB_MOD_GAP is
> >> supposed to do...?  To be honest, I do not know what it is about.
> >
> > Pavel did.  Check previous mails.
> 
> I just see him raising his concerns.  Or do I have to look at some
> other thread?

"Testing on PowerMac G4" for the long explanation.  A short explanation was
committed in a C comment before GRUB_MOD_GAP definition.

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)