[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:44:51 -0500 |
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:30 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 10:09:10AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Also, I don't see how GRUB_MOD_GAP would not be defined to 0x8000 for
> > > i386-ieee1275 platform considering that
> > > include/grub/i386/ieee1275/kernel.h simply includes
> > > include/grub/powerpc/ieee1275/kernel.h
> >
> > Sounds strange.. I'm wondering that myself. Will check..
>
> Ah, right. The problem is not on i386-ieee1275 but on i386-linuxbios,
> which uses util/elf/grub-mkimage.c.
Sorry, I didn't realize that i386-linuxbios was affected by my patch.
> So, we define GRUB_MOD_GAP for every port that wants to use ELF ? Or we
> put the fallback only in grub-mkimage.c ? I don't like either of the
> solutions very much :-(
>
> What do you suggest?
I would prefer to have GRUB_MOD_GAP is all headers. Once it's not
needed, it could be removed across the board.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Redefining GRUB_MOD_GAP in init.c, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/27
- Re: Redefining GRUB_MOD_GAP in init.c, Robert Millan, 2008/01/28
- GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Robert Millan, 2008/01/28
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/29
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/29
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/30
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Robert Millan, 2008/01/30
- Re: GRUB_MOD_GAP for non-ieee1275 ELF platforms, Pavel Roskin, 2008/01/30