[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: netboot/UNDI status
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: netboot/UNDI status |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:25:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:00:17AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:42, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver collection that's
> >> even better, of course. This was done for GRUB Legacy, right?
> >
> > Sure. I had a very short conversation with gpxe developers last year, and
> > we
> > have agreed that we should share work. In GRUB Legacy, we tried to keep
> > etherboot drivers as intact as possible, and we contributed back by
> > providing
> > bug fixes. IMO, this should be continued in GRUB 2 as well.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but aren't some files licensed under
> the GPL, with an additional demand that you shouldn't use it outside
> etherboot?
Just one driver is known to do that. Check our BTS.
Besides, it might even be illegal to distribute those drivers, even as part of
etherboot.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, (continued)
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/25
- Re: netboot/UNDI status,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/25