[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: netboot/UNDI status
From: |
Marco Gerards |
Subject: |
Re: netboot/UNDI status |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:00:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:42, Robert Millan wrote:
>> Well, if we can collaborate by sharing the same driver collection that's
>> even better, of course. This was done for GRUB Legacy, right?
>
> Sure. I had a very short conversation with gpxe developers last year, and we
> have agreed that we should share work. In GRUB Legacy, we tried to keep
> etherboot drivers as intact as possible, and we contributed back by providing
> bug fixes. IMO, this should be continued in GRUB 2 as well.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but aren't some files licensed under
the GPL, with an additional demand that you shouldn't use it outside
etherboot?
I will have to check this to be sure. But something to wrap their
drivers for GRUB 2 so it cooperates would be nice... I just do not
like glue code that much...
--
Marco
- netboot/UNDI status, Douglas Ward, 2008/01/21
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status,
Marco Gerards <=
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/25
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/25