Re: [PATCH] Fix eisa_mmap evaluation, add memory existence check

[Robert Millan]

On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:09:25PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:53:23PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote:
> >> >Ah, and why 0xcf instead of 0xff ?
> >> >
> >> >  
> >> 
> >> ... or 0xaa or 0x55.
> >
> > 0xaa and 0x55 are typicaly used directly in memory because every bit is
> > negated, which is precisely what `^ 0xff' would do.
> 
> Robert, can you take care of this patch?  You have more expertise with
> this than I do :-)

Sure.

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)