Re: binutils version?

[James Hartley]

On 3/15/07, Gregg C Levine <address@hidden> wrote:

Do you see any problems regarding the LZO version, and more importantly as
to where it was placed? Or just with the binary utilities?

I have run into the "LZO library version 1.02 or later is required" message, however, I also found the following link which states that playing with the flags sent to the linker can be used as a workaround:

http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/2006-04/msg00074.html

Are you saying that the LZO issue is the only problem to be worked around, & that having binutils 2.17 is sufficient?

Thanks for any clarification you can provide.

Jim