[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:04:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:09, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> > I am all for something that is simple. Initially it looked like
> > Hollis' proposal was more complex, but IIRC he mentioned he wanted to
> > work on making this easier to use. Isn't this what he did? Or did I
> > misunderstand something? If someone (Hollis in this case) thinks I am
> > wrong and comes with a good argumentation, I am always willing to
> > change my opinion.
>
> I already illustrated how easy it is:
> MB_HEADER()
> MB_START_TAGS()
> MB_LOADADDR(0x1234)
> MB_ENTRYADDR(0x1234)
> MB_END_TAGS()
>
> Please explain if you think this it too difficult.
I have already said why this is not applicable to all users.
> Note: I refuse to believe that ORing flags into a .long is less complex.
I do, too. It is as as complex as using tags. So what?
Okuji
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Marco Gerards, 2006/12/02
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Marco Gerards, 2006/12/04
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/12/05
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/12/07
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/12/12
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/12/12
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/12/13
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Marco Gerards, 2006/12/13