[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some multiboot2 comments
|
From: |
Tristan Gingold |
|
Subject: |
Re: some multiboot2 comments |
|
Date: |
Sat, 4 Nov 2006 15:40:22 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:52:02PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Monday 30 October 2006 21:24, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > The best raison is to have a unified method to identify a module. IMHO the
> > argument line is to be interpreted only by the module.
> >
> > You know all the parameters can be put into the command line...
>
> So you don't want to mix up arguments to a module itself and arguments to a
> kernel. This makes sense. Can you propose how to pass this information
> exactly?
Using the multiboot draft, we may add new K/L/D fields within the module KLD.
> BTW, raison is French. ;)
I am not very sure...
Tristan.