[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2Yoshinori K. Okuji
|
From: |
Ruslan Nikolaev |
|
Subject: |
Re: 2Yoshinori K. Okuji |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:03:14 -0700 (PDT) |
> I have no idea which patch is better, so please decide it with Marco.
I also can't say what is better. However my patch already works perfectly on my x86_64 machine with Linux w/o 32-bit binaries support. All compiled utilities are 64-bit. Chainloading, multiboot and linux loading working. The patch is smaller and very simple. It also doesn't change build system just for x86_64.
> However, your assignment is not finished, right? How much time does it take?
I hope it will be soon. But who knows...
This is a very small patch; I can write "copyright disclaimer" if it would be easily... Does it requires any signs on real papers?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- [PATCH] new patch for amd64, Ruslan Nikolaev, 2005/09/20
- Re: [PATCH] new patch for amd64, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/09/21
- Re: 2Yoshinori K. Okuji,
Ruslan Nikolaev <=
- Re: [PATCH] new patch for amd64, Marco Gerards, 2005/09/21
- Re: 2Marco Gerards, Ruslan Nikolaev, 2005/09/21
- Re: 2Marco Gerards (new), Ruslan Nikolaev, 2005/09/21
- Re: 2Marco Gerards (new), Marco Gerards, 2005/09/22
- Re: 2Marco Gerards (important info), Ruslan Nikolaev, 2005/09/22
- Re: 2Marco Gerards (important info), Marco Gerards, 2005/09/23
- Re: 2Marco Gerards (answer), Ruslan Nikolaev, 2005/09/24