[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PPC executable name
From: |
Nico -telmich- Schottelius |
Subject: |
Re: PPC executable name |
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2005 10:49:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
echo $message | gpg -e $sender -s | netcat mailhost 25 |
Marco Gerards [Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:03:57PM +0200]:
> Hollis Blanchard <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'd like to rename the PPC executable from "grubof" to "grub". If
> > nothing else, it will avoid the question "is it grubof.cfg or
> > grub.cfg?". Thoughts?
>
> What I would prefer is _grub or so. To make clear it is not usable
> just like this. We don't want people loading this file directly.
> Adding a "_" might make it clear this is a file that is weird in a way
> and users should not use it directly. The name `grubof' is not *that*
> bad either. People do not use it directly, right?
>
> For any arch the config file should be called grub.cfg, IMO.
Oh, I misunderstood hollis, if that's true. I thought grubof will later
be the 'call it with a configuration, wait some seconds, and grub is
installed'-tool.
Btw, what will the way you advise,
a) like yaboot, mount the bootstrap partiton only when writing config
b) or mount it as /boot, modifiy grub.cfg on it?
I would like the later option, because as far as I understood, making
changes to grub.cfg does not need any command execution, as grub
(the binary, which can be loaded by of) didn't change.
Or is this assumption wrong?
Nico
--
Keep it simple & stupid, use what's available.
Please use pgp encryption: 8D0E 27A4 is my id.
http://nico.schotteli.us | http://linux.schottelius.org
pgpjxyh2ZZt_Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature