[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fs/fat.c assumes that 0UL is the same for 32bit and 64bit archs
|
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
|
Subject: |
Re: fs/fat.c assumes that 0UL is the same for 32bit and 64bit archs |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:40:37 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 22:20, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Because this seems to be the only way to fix this problem, I don't
> think there are copyright issues and the patch can be applied.
> Right?
How about this instead of 0xffffffff:
~((grub_uint32_t) 0)
I don't know which is better.
You don't have to care about the copyright, because the change is very
small.
Okuji