Re: compiling with 2.95

[Yoshinori K. Okuji]

On Wednesday 02 March 2005 16:03, Vincent Guffens wrote:
> 1) unnamed union
> 2) declaration not at the beginning of a block
> 3) undefined symbol (memset)

I see.

> Although I don't know if you are interrested in that or not, I'm
> sending some modifications about these three items that allows grub 2
> to be compiled with 2.95.4 (at least on my system).

Your patch is definitely useful. But I'm not sure about unnamed union... 
It is not so convenient to specify union names. I think the code was 
written by Marco, so I'd like to hear his opinion about this.

> I'm not used to send patches so I might be doing something wrong,
> please tell me if it is the case.

Please write ChangeLog.

Okuji