[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Differences in `ne` and `bp` line-breaking behavior
|
From: |
Tadziu Hoffmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Differences in `ne` and `bp` line-breaking behavior |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Dec 2024 22:12:58 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) |
> Also .ne is effective in the absence of traps, a fact
> that groff(7) misses, too.
In groff at least, the page bottom acts like a trap,
consistent with register .t (distance to the next trap)
showing the distance to the page bottom in the absence
of any other (nearer) traps.
- Re: Differences in `ne` and `bp` line-breaking behavior, (continued)