[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?
|
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
|
Subject: |
Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 2 Aug 2021 21:06:18 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?
GNU refer doesn't. Neither did AT&T refer according to my searches.
Seems like kind of a basic thing to leave out.
What to do? Stick it onto the end of the %T (title)? Shove it into the
%O (other) closet?
Inaugurate a GNU extension? <evil laugh>
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Why does refer(1) have no database field for "edition"?,
G. Branden Robinson <=