[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ms] Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .A
|
From: |
Dave Kemper |
|
Subject: |
Re: [ms] Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2021 04:34:50 -0600 |
On 1/4/21, Denis M. Wilson <dmw@oxytropis.plus.com> wrote:
> rfc1345 does not have a base-line ellipsis, a character frequently used
> in English writing.
> It is available as \N'188' in the symbol font or as \[u2026].
Since commit aac5fd24 (2003), it has been available in the Symbol font
as \[u2026] as well, no longer requiring the \N syntax to access it --
a good thing, since, like .char, \N inhibits kerning (though this is
moot for the ellipsis in the default groff fonts while
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58897 is unresolved).
Re: [ms] Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM?, Dave Kemper, 2021/01/13
Re: [ms] Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM?, Dave Kemper, 2021/01/14
Re: [ms] Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM?, Dave Kemper, 2021/01/23