[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM?
From: |
Dorai Sitaram |
Subject: |
Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:07:06 +0000 (UTC) |
s.tmac defines a bunch of strings to display extra glyphs if the user calls the
.AM macro. Most of these glyphs are already available with standard glyph
names, and, as far as I can tell, the only new glyph defined is the hooked o,
(equivalent to Latin small letter o with ogonek). Both a string \*q and an
escape sequence \[hooko] are defined. Is there any reason why the \[hooko]
definition can't be moved outside of .AM, preferably with the more standard
(RFC1354) name that looks like a winking pig, i.e., \(o; ?
(For comparison, .AM defines \*3, but the corresponding escape sequence \[yogh]
is defined outside of .AM.)
-d
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Add a standard glyph name for hooked o instead of relying on .AM?,
Dorai Sitaram <=