[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible regression with `groff -C`
|
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
|
Subject: |
Re: Possible regression with `groff -C` |
|
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2020 11:17:01 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
At 2020-04-12T11:12:32+1000, John Gardner wrote:
> After building Groff from master, I noticed one of Roff.js's regression
> tests failed when asserting compatibility mode:
>
> *Command:*
> printf '.ds FOO BAR\n\\*[FOO]' | groff -C -Tutf8 | head -n1
>
>
> *Expected output:*
> FOO]
>
> *Actual output:*
> BAR
Yup. Can reproduce. Will attempt to bisect.
Thanks, John.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Possible regression with `groff -C`, John Gardner, 2020/04/11
- Re: Possible regression with `groff -C`,
G. Branden Robinson <=
- Re: Possible regression with `groff -C`, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/04/11
- Re: Possible regression with `groff -C`, John Gardner, 2020/04/11
- Re: Possible regression with `groff -C`, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/04/11
- Re: Possible regression with `groff -C`, John Gardner, 2020/04/11
- [PATCH] new .cp register; was: Possible regression with `groff -C`, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/04/13
- Re: [PATCH] new .cp register; was: Possible regression with `groff -C`, John Gardner, 2020/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] new .cp register; was: Possible regression with `groff -C`, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/04/14
- Re: [PATCH] new .cp register; was: Possible regression with `groff -C`, Ingo Schwarze, 2020/04/14