[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?
From: |
Gerard Lally |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:28:05 +0100 |
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, at 13:18, Damian McGuckin wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Gerard Lally wrote:
>
> > I anticipate *roff satisfying 95% of my needs Damian: articles, letters,
> > reports, technical papers. It's great to hear from you people who have
> > been using it "from the dawn of creation"!
>
> I think that is a compliment???
;-)
Just a little tongue in cheek!
- [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Gerard Lally, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Robert Thorsby, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Gerard Lally, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Peter Schaffter, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Damian McGuckin, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Gerard Lally, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Damian McGuckin, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?,
Gerard Lally <=
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Ted Harding, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, John Gardner, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/10/24
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Ted Harding, 2016/10/23
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Peter Schaffter, 2016/10/23
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2016/10/24