[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?
From: |
Gerard Lally |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:15:23 +0100 |
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, at 23:24, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016, Gerard Lally wrote:
> > Is it possible to lay out a page, as in the attached sample file,
> > using *roff? I'm about to commit myself to learning troff and friends
> > more thoroughly. Before I start I'd like to have a broad idea of its
> > limitations.
>
> It's all doable with groff. The images would have to be converted
> to PostScript or PDF, depending on the macro package and output
> device used (i.e. -Tps [PostScript device, grops] or -Tpdf [PDF
> device, gropdf]). Whatever fonts you're using could easily be
> converted for groff (Type 1, TrueType, OpenType can all be
> converted).
>
> I would not, however, use groff for this kind of layout. The effort
> involved wouldn't be worth the candle. A good page layout program
> is more suitable because it would allow quick, visual positioning of
> the images and blocks of type. In groff, you'd have to specify
> every horizontal and vertical page motion, which, unless you were
> working from a fully marked-up mockup, would involve a lot of trial
> and error, especially for text flowing around objects.
What if you have a mixed document, like a magazine article, where you
might have pages of text interspersed with a page here and there of text
and graphics? You would still want *roff for its typographical benefits,
surely? Have you ever used *roff and a page layout program together to
produce a single document like this?
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Damian McGuckin, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Gerard Lally, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Damian McGuckin, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Gerard Lally, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Ted Harding, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, John Gardner, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/10/24
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Ted Harding, 2016/10/23
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Peter Schaffter, 2016/10/23
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?,
Gerard Lally <=
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Gerard Lally, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, John Gardner, 2016/10/24
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2016/10/25
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Steve Izma, 2016/10/25
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Damian McGuckin, 2016/10/25
- Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Mike Bianchi, 2016/10/26
Re: [Groff] *roff for desktop publishing - is it feasible?, Doug McIlroy, 2016/10/23