[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] text variants
|
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] text variants |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:04:41 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.8.5-206-gfc8f312-dirty |
Hello.
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
|> It seems more likely, though, that these markers were erroneously
|> removed during the rather extensive changes introduced in this
|> commit -- surely the point about the font metrics for these glyphs
|> remains true. Bernd?
|
|Please restore the markers.
I wonder what those "+" markers are for, they have been added in
[48615a4]. Whereas explanation for the *** markers has been added
in [d855e16], those remain untold?
--steffen
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/26
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Dave Kemper, 2015/12/27
- Re: [Groff] text variants, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/12/26
Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15
Re: [Groff] text variants, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2015/12/15