groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Problem with tables changing setting.


From: Denis M. Wilson
Subject: Re: [Groff] Problem with tables changing setting.
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 16:51:27 +0100

Try correcting line 7 to .vs 14.4

Does that improve what you want?

Denis

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:06:41 +0200
Radek <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello, it's me Radek again.
> It's hard to describe my problems so I will try to isolate them and
> create small demonstration cases.  And this is one of them.
> I do not know if the attachment will pass the list, because I need to
> show the PDF i got as an evidence what's happening.  In case it will
> not pass the source code is:
> 
> \# -*- mode: nroff; -*-
> \# $Header$
> \# Demonstrate the broken table typesetting.
> .
> \# Set the base font size.
> .ps 12
> .pv 14.4
> .
> \# Define necessary macros for this document
> \# Render the code example.
> .de %CODE
> .nf
> .in +5
> .ft CR
> ..
> .de %ENDCODE
> .ft TR
> .in -5
> .fi
> ..
> .
> Now, this is some text.  Looks good.  Now typeset the table.
> See following variables.
> .%CODE
> \&.f = \n[.f]
> \&.s = \n[.s]
> \&.v = \n[.v]
> \&.i = \n[.i]
> \&.l = \n[.l]
> \&.L = \n[.L]
> \&.j = \n[.j]
> \&.u = \n[.u]
> \&.ce = \n[.ce]
> .%ENDCODE
> .
> .TS
> center;
> c c
> c l.
> char    Unit
> _
> c    Centimeters
> i    Inches
> m    Ems
> n    Ens
> p    Points
> P    Picas
> .TE
> Now see this text.  Is it good size and shape?
> It is not.  And see the variables again.
> .%CODE
> \&.f = \n[.f]
> \&.s = \n[.s]
> \&.v = \n[.v]
> \&.i = \n[.i]
> \&.l = \n[.l]
> \&.L = \n[.L]
> \&.j = \n[.j]
> \&.u = \n[.u]
> \&.ce = \n[.ce]
> .%ENDCODE
> Something is either wrong, or I do not underestand how to use
> \fItbl\fP. .br
> .sp 2v
> The groff used to get this PDF is version \n(.x.\n(.y.\n(.Y.
> .\" EOF
> 
> 
> And I can upload the PDF to my small web but my connectivity is bad
> now. http://www.hnilica.cz/tmp/groff/table.pdf
> 
> Do I something wrongly, or is there a bug in tbl?
> 


-- 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]