Re: [Groff] Strange error messages from Groff 1.22.3

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:33:58 +0000
> From: Keith Marshall <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
> 
> Out of curiosity, Eli, why did you find it necessary to move
> stringclass.h to an earlier position in the include order?  Is it not a
> symptom of either a flawed design, or an implementation fault, if that
> matters?  Is there a MinGW issue which may need investigation?  Or is it
> simply that you've introduced a dependency on stringclass.h within
> lib.h?  (In which case, would it not have been better to have lib.h
> itself include stringclass.h?)

It's IMO a Groff problem that is not specific to MinGW: stringclass.h
is not idempotent.  I was too lazy to fix that, sorry.